In-House vs Agency Recruitment: Finding what suits your business

The very foundation of every company is its employee base. The success of a company is a direct reflection of its peculiar employee recruitment. Whether employing recruitment agencies or conducting in-house hiring, the ultimate objective remains consistent: to attract top-tier employees. While both have their own pros and cons, each requirement is specific to a company or a role. Hence, the method of recruitment is tailored according to the requirement. Every growing or existing company will reach a milestone where they are expanding and need to look into hiring new people. There are generally two routes a company can go when it hits this milestone. The organization can hire an in-house recruiter to manage all the hiring responsibilities or it can outsource the efforts to a recruiting agency.

​

 One of the initial observations you're likely to make while collaborating with a recruiter from a staffing agency is their strong sales skills. Given their primary objective of generating revenue for the agency, they concentrate on promoting their services to both companies seeking to hire and potential candidates. They will warmly embrace your company as a client and assure you that they will provide a diverse selection of highly skilled professionals for your consideration. When engaging with candidates, agency recruiters exhibit the same level of confidence by emphasizing that your role presents an outstanding opportunity that will enhance the individual's career prospects. Most internal recruiters do not possess the same sales-oriented mindset. Their primary objective revolves around identifying talented candidates who align with the job requirements, team dynamics, and overall company culture. They prioritize the company's long-term goals and strive to fill multiple positions while minimizing employee turnover. In-house recruiters tend to be transparent and proactive in their interactions with both hiring managers and candidates, aiming to match individuals with the appropriate backgrounds to the company's specific needs​​.​​​​​​​​​​​​

​

Internal recruiters demonstrate a high level of attention to detail. They prioritize meeting with the hiring manager to gain a comprehensive understanding of the role's specific requirements before initiating the job posting process. They proactively source candidates from various channels and thoroughly screen each one before arranging interviews. If the initial pool of candidates fails to impress the hiring team, they are open to revising the job description and attracting more applicants. On the other hand, agency recruiters emphasize efficiency. Their aim is to assist your company in swiftly filling the vacant role, allowing them to receive compensation and move on to the next opportunity. In some cases, they may already have a database of pre-screened candidates readily available, eliminating the need for extensive sourcing and enabling prompt interview scheduling. They are likely to present you with several diverse options to consider.

 

Specialized staffing agencies often focus on recruiting for specific job roles. They possess a deep understanding of the necessary skills and can effectively identify candidates with suitable backgrounds. This expertise enables them to expedite the hiring process as they don't require significant time to familiarize themselves with the hiring manager's preferences. Collaborating with the right recruitment agency proves especially advantageous when seeking candidates for technical roles or positions that face a scarcity of qualified individuals. Conversely, in-house recruiters typically serve as generalists, responsible for hiring across various departments within the company. While they may occasionally lack specific job-related knowledge, they possess a deep understanding of the qualities and values your company seeks in its employees. If your company has long-term growth plans, your in-house recruiting team can strategically plan and execute a comprehensive hiring roadmap, ensuring that the right positions are filled at the appropriate times.

​

An in-house recruiter functions as a regular employee within your organization. They require a salary or hourly rate along with the provision of benefits. However, there are alternative approaches you can consider to optimize resources. One option is to leverage your HR department to handle recruitment responsibilities in addition to their existing roles. Another possibility is to engage a part-time recruiter or hire a recruiter as a 1099 contractor, especially if your company doesn't have the financial resources or demand for a full-time in-house employee. This allows for flexibility and cost efficiency while still addressing your recruitment needs. When choosing between an agency recruiter and an in-house recruiter, the decision often boils down to budget considerations. Engaging a recruiting agency is generally more cost-effective. Pricing structures may vary among agencies, but most commonly charge a percentage of the newly hired employee's salary. Moreover, you can opt to work with a recruiting agency on an as-needed basis. You will only incur charges when a successful hire is made, and if the staffing firm fails to meet your expectations, you have the flexibility to explore other options.